↓ Skip to main content

Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation

Overview of attention for article published in Science and Engineering Ethics, March 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
177 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation
Published in
Science and Engineering Ethics, March 1997
DOI 10.1007/s11948-997-0017-3
Authors

J. Scott Armstrong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Germany 2 2%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 121 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 23%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Researcher 13 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 9%
Other 41 31%
Unknown 8 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 29 22%
Social Sciences 21 16%
Computer Science 16 12%
Environmental Science 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Other 32 24%
Unknown 15 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,235,949
of 23,950,095 outputs
Outputs from Science and Engineering Ethics
#83
of 948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#371
of 30,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science and Engineering Ethics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,950,095 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them