↓ Skip to main content

Adult Sexual Attraction to Early-Stage Adolescents: Phallometry Doesn’t Equal Pathology

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Adult Sexual Attraction to Early-Stage Adolescents: Phallometry Doesn’t Equal Pathology
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, October 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10508-008-9428-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas K. Zander

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 26%
Researcher 7 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Other 2 7%
Lecturer 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 41%
Social Sciences 6 22%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Linguistics 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 3 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2,124
of 3,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,274
of 90,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#14
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.