↓ Skip to main content

Corticospinal projections to lower limb motoneurons in man

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, June 1992
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
204 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
Title
Corticospinal projections to lower limb motoneurons in man
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, June 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf00229889
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. Brouwer, P. Ashby

Abstract

The projections of cortical neurons activated by transcranial magnetic stimulation to single lower limb spinal motoneurons were examined in 34 normal subjects. Peristimulus time histograms of the discharge times of single, voluntarily activated motor units were used to derive information about postsynaptic potentials in single spinal motoneurons produced by magnetic stimuli applied over the contralateral scalp. All tibialis anterior motor units and the majority of motoneurons innervating the small muscles of the foot showed strong short latency facilitation. About half of the motoneurons of proximal lower limb muscles showed this facilitation. Short latency facilitation of the motoneurons of soleus and medial gastrocnemius was only rarely observed and when present was weak. The short latency facilitation is attributed to the projections of the fast corticospinal pathway with monosynaptic projections to motoneurons. The relative strength of the facilitation in different motoneuron pools is considered to reflect the density of corticospinal projections to that motoneuron pool. The observed pattern of projections in man shows some differences from the pattern of projections in subhuman primates that might reflect the different use of the limb.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 118 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 20%
Researcher 23 18%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Professor 8 6%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 21 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 21 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 16%
Neuroscience 21 16%
Engineering 14 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 9%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 27 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,339,607
of 25,388,229 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#753
of 3,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,216
of 18,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,229 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them