↓ Skip to main content

Experience of using a lightweight formal specification method for a commercial embedded system product line

Overview of attention for article published in Requirements Engineering, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Experience of using a lightweight formal specification method for a commercial embedded system product line
Published in
Requirements Engineering, April 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00766-004-0209-1
Authors

Michael Breen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 4%
Indonesia 1 4%
Brazil 1 4%
Sweden 1 4%
South Africa 1 4%
Unknown 18 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 13%
Professor 2 9%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 18 78%
Engineering 2 9%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Unknown 1 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Requirements Engineering
#55
of 199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,263
of 57,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Requirements Engineering
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them