↓ Skip to main content

Mass recruitment to nectar sources inParaponera clavata: A field study

Overview of attention for article published in Insectes Sociaux, June 1985
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Mass recruitment to nectar sources inParaponera clavata: A field study
Published in
Insectes Sociaux, June 1985
DOI 10.1007/bf02224233
Authors

M. D. Breed, B. Bennett

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 24%
Professor 3 18%
Other 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 76%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Insectes Sociaux
#323
of 966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,769
of 9,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insectes Sociaux
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them