| Title |
Leg oedema protection from a buckwheat herb tea in patients with chronic venous insufficiency: a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, July 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s002280050138 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
N. Ihme, H. Kiesewetter, F. Jung, K. H. Hoffmann, A. Birk, A. Müller, K. I. Grützner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 61 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 31% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 19 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2022.
All research outputs
#5,338,984
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#522
of 2,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,673
of 28,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.