| Title |
The ocular disease of Aristodemus and Eurytus 480 BC: diagnostic considerations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Ophthalmology, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10792-012-9638-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Barend F. Hogewind, Joannes A. F. Coebergh, Niels C. Gritters-van den Oever, Michiel W. P. de Wolf, Gerard J. van der Wielen |
| Abstract |
In the historic description of Herodotus on the battle of Thermopylae at 480 BC two formerly healthy warriors suffer from "ophthalmia". The purpose of this study is to assess the possible aetiologies of this disease. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,722,978
of 23,485,204 outputs
Outputs from International Ophthalmology
#131
of 1,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,673
of 291,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Ophthalmology
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,204 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,057 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.