↓ Skip to main content

Ozone Enema: A Model of Microscopic Colitis in Rats

Overview of attention for article published in Digestive Diseases and Sciences, November 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Ozone Enema: A Model of Microscopic Colitis in Rats
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, November 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1012348525208
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rami Eliakim, Fanny Karmeli, Danny Rachmilewitz, Petricia Cohen, Ari Zimran

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 22%
Other 4 17%
Professor 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 17%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2009.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#1,546
of 4,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,660
of 45,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 45,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.