↓ Skip to main content

Localization of mitochondrial DNA encoded cytochrome c oxidase subunits I and II in rat pancreatic zymogen granules and pituitary growth hormone granules

Overview of attention for article published in Histochemistry and Cell Biology, August 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Localization of mitochondrial DNA encoded cytochrome c oxidase subunits I and II in rat pancreatic zymogen granules and pituitary growth hormone granules
Published in
Histochemistry and Cell Biology, August 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00418-005-0056-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Skanda K. Sadacharan, Bhag Singh, Timothy Bowes, Radhey S. Gupta

Abstract

Cytochrome c oxidase (COX) complex is an integral part of the electron transport chain. Three subunits of this complex (COX I, COX II and COX III) are encoded by mitochondrial (mit-) DNA. High-resolution immunogold electron microscopy has been used to study the subcellular localization of COX I and COX II in rat tissue sections, embedded in LR Gold resin, using monoclonal antibodies for these proteins. Immunofluorescence labeling of BS-C-1 monkey kidney cells with these antibodies showed characteristic mitochondrial labeling. In immunogold labeling studies, the COX I and COX II antibodies showed strong and specific mitochondrial labeling in the liver, kidney, heart and pancreas. However, in rat pancreatic acinar tissue, in addition to mitochondrial labeling, strong and specific labeling was also observed in the zymogen granules (ZGs). In the anterior pituitary, strong labeling with these antibodies was seen in the growth hormone secretory granules. In contrast to these compartments, the COX I or COX II antibodies showed only minimal labeling (five- to tenfold lower) of the cytoplasm, endoplasmic reticulum and the nucleus. Strong labeling with the COX I or COX II antibodies was also observed in highly purified ZGs from bovine pancreas. The observed labeling, in all cases, was completely abolished upon omission of the primary antibodies. These results provide evidence that, similar to a number of other recently studied mit-proteins, COX I and COX II are also present outside the mitochondria. The presence of mit-DNA encoded COX I and COX II in extramitochondrial compartments, provides strong evidence that proteins can exit, or are exported, from the mitochondria. Although the mechanisms responsible for protein exit/export remain to be elucidated, these results raise fundamental questions concerning the roles of mitochondria and mitochondrial proteins in diverse cellular processes in different compartments.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Student > Master 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,064,660
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#247
of 926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,592
of 60,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 926 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.