↓ Skip to main content

From Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) Signals to Brain Temperature Maps

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
From Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) Signals to Brain Temperature Maps
Published in
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11538-011-9645-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberto C. Sotero, Yasser Iturria-Medina

Abstract

A theoretical framework is presented for converting Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) images to brain temperature maps, based on the idea that disproportional local changes in cerebral blood flow (CBF) as compared with cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen consumption (CMRO₂) during functional brain activity, lead to both brain temperature changes and the BOLD effect. Using an oxygen limitation model and a BOLD signal model, we obtain a transcendental equation relating CBF and CMRO₂ changes with the corresponding BOLD signal, which is solved in terms of the Lambert W function. Inserting this result in the dynamic bioheat equation describing the rate of temperature changes in the brain, we obtain a nonautonomous ordinary differential equation that depends on the BOLD response, which is solved numerically for each brain voxel. Temperature maps obtained from a real BOLD dataset registered in an attention to visual motion experiment were calculated, obtaining temperature variations in the range: (-0.15, 0.1) which is consistent with experimental results. The statistical analysis revealed that significant temperature activations have a similar distribution pattern than BOLD activations. An interesting difference was the activation of the precuneus in temperature maps, a region involved in visuospatial processing, an effect that was not observed on BOLD maps. Furthermore, temperature maps were more localized to gray matter regions than the original BOLD maps, showing less activated voxels in white matter and cerebrospinal fluid.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 9%
Turkey 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 35 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 35%
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 9 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 16%
Physics and Astronomy 5 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 12%
Neuroscience 5 12%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 3 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2011.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#299
of 1,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,159
of 108,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,094 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them