↓ Skip to main content

Development and Intercomparison of Condensed Isoprene Oxidation Mechanisms for Global Atmospheric Modeling

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, September 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
201 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Development and Intercomparison of Condensed Isoprene Oxidation Mechanisms for Global Atmospheric Modeling
Published in
Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, September 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1006391009798
Authors

Ulrich Pöschl, Rolf von Kuhlmann, Nathalie Poisson, Paul J. Crutzen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Cyprus 1 1%
Unknown 66 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 29%
Researcher 19 27%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 21 30%
Environmental Science 16 23%
Chemistry 10 14%
Chemical Engineering 3 4%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 14 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2021.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry
#92
of 354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,312
of 38,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 354 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them