| Title |
Lactobacillus kosoi sp. nov., a fructophilic species isolated from kôso, a Japanese sugar-vegetable fermented beverage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10482-018-1019-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tai-Ying Chiou, Wataru Suda, Kenshiro Oshima, Masahira Hattori, Chiaki Matsuzaki, Kenji Yamamoto, Tomoya Takahashi |
| Abstract |
A novel Gram-positive, fructophilic, catalase negative, and rod-shaped strain, designated strain 10HT was isolated from kôso, a Japanese sugar-vegetable fermented beverage obtained from a food processing factory in Saku City, Nagano Prefecture, Japan. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed strain 10HT to belong to the genus Lactobacillus, with closely related type strains being Lactobacillus kunkeei YH-15T (95.5% sequence similarity), Lactobacillus ozensis Mizu2-1T (95.4% sequence similarity), and Lactobacillus apinorum Fhon13NT (95.3% sequence similarity). The isolate was found to grow at 18-39 °C (optimum 27 °C), pH 4.0-7.0 (optimum pH 6.5) and in the presence of 0-2% NaCl (optimum 0% NaCl). The G + C content of its genomic DNA was determined to be 30.5 mol%. The major fatty acid (≥ 10%) components identified included C16:0, C19:0 cyclo ω7c, C19:0 cyclo ω9c, and C18:1 ω9c. The polar lipids were identified as lysophosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylethanolamine and glycolipids. The predominant isoprenoid quinones (> 10%) were identified as MK-7, MK-8, MK-9 and MK-10. The amino acid composition of the cell wall was detected as comprising Asp, Glu, Ala, and Lys but the strain lacks meso-diaminopimelic acid. As with other fructophilic lactic acid bacteria, such as L. kunkeei and L. apinorum, strain 10HT was found to prefer D-fructose to D-glucose as a growth substrate. On the basis of these genetic and phenotypic results, the isolate is concluded to represent a novel species, for which the name Lactobacillus kosoi is proposed. The type strain is 10HT (= NBRC 113063T = BCRC 81100T). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2018.
All research outputs
#20,459,801
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#1,750
of 2,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#378,289
of 441,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#43
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,036 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.