↓ Skip to main content

Phylogenetic split of Larix: evidence from paternally inherited cpDNA trnT-trnF region

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Systematics and Evolution, May 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Phylogenetic split of Larix: evidence from paternally inherited cpDNA trnT-trnF region
Published in
Plant Systematics and Evolution, May 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00606-002-0264-3
Authors

X.-X. Wei, X.-Q. Wang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Professor 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 68%
Environmental Science 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#152
of 956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,836
of 54,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 956 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.