↓ Skip to main content

Anticoincidence counting further improves detection limits of short-lived products by pseudo-cyclic instrumental neutron activation analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Anticoincidence counting further improves detection limits of short-lived products by pseudo-cyclic instrumental neutron activation analysis
Published in
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10967-014-3540-0
Authors

W. Zhang, A. Chatt

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2015.
All research outputs
#21,415,544
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry
#1,109
of 1,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,142
of 241,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry
#23
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.