You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Novel Method to Measure Artificial Eye Motility
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1097/iop.0000000000000804 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daphne L. Mourits, Dyonne T. Hartong, Johannes H. M. van Beek, Birgit I. Witte, H. Stevie Tan, Annette C. Moll |
| Abstract |
To measure objectively, reproducibly, and noninvasively artificial eye motility, a fundamental aspect in the (cosmetic) outcome of enucleation. A gaze- and pupil-tracking system, the "iView X," was implemented to measure horizontal eye motility. The system, with adjusted software, was tested with patients wearing 1 prosthetic eye after enucleation for retinoblastoma. Measurements were repeated 5 times in every patient and analyses were performed twice by 2 independent observers. Reproducibility was tested via linear mixed models. After the implementation of the method, more data were obtained, including more patients with a history of enucleation for the treatment of retinoblastoma for eye tracker measurement, and differences in motility percentages between implant types and sizes were analyzed via Mann-Whitney U tests. The intraclass correlation coefficient of the interobserver variable in the patient test group (n = 27, 6-53 years) was 0.98 and 0.96 for measurement of left gaze and right gaze, respectively. Intraobserver variation was <0.001. In the total of 58 included patients for comparative analysis, mean difference of prosthesis motility compared with the contralateral eye in abduction was 57.1% (range 3.2-91.5%); in adduction 65.8% (range 24.0-92.0%). No statistical differences were found between the different implant types and sizes. Motility measurements of the prosthetic eye in comparison to the contralateral eye using the iView X system are reproducible and reliable. This is, to the authors' knowledge, the first easy applicable, noninvasive, reproducible, and commercially available instrument to evaluate prosthesis motility. With the adjusted software program (freely available on request), a similar objective measurement can be performed worldwide. The implant size or type did not influence the outcome of the motility measurement; this finding deserves additional study. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 44% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2017.
All research outputs
#22,760,732
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#950
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,266
of 340,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#3
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.