| Title |
A locally adaptive window for signal matching
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Computer Vision, January 1992
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00128133 |
| Authors |
Masatoshi Okutomi, Takeo Kanade |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 37 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 21% |
| Researcher | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 24% |
| Unknown | 4 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 17 | 40% |
| Engineering | 13 | 31% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,398,961
of 23,466,057 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Vision
#114
of 1,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,496
of 62,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Vision
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,466,057 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them