↓ Skip to main content

Regional Speciation or Taxonomic Inflation? The Status of Several Narrowly Distributed and Endangered Species of Narcissus Using ISSR and Nuclear Ribosomal ITS Markers

Overview of attention for article published in Folia Geobotanica, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 242)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Regional Speciation or Taxonomic Inflation? The Status of Several Narrowly Distributed and Endangered Species of Narcissus Using ISSR and Nuclear Ribosomal ITS Markers
Published in
Folia Geobotanica, June 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12224-009-9040-2
Authors

Juan F. Jiménez, Pedro Sánchez-Gómez, Juan Guerra, Arántzazu Molins, Josep A. Rosselló

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 38 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 25%
Researcher 10 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 57%
Environmental Science 6 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 2 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Folia Geobotanica
#36
of 242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,938
of 111,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Geobotanica
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 242 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them