↓ Skip to main content

Global versus local mechanisms of temperature sensing in ion channels

Overview of attention for article published in Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Global versus local mechanisms of temperature sensing in ion channels
Published in
Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00424-017-2102-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristina Arrigoni, Daniel L. Minor

Abstract

Ion channels turn diverse types of inputs, ranging from neurotransmitters to physical forces, into electrical signals. Channel responses to ligands generally rely on binding to discrete sensor domains that are coupled to the portion of the channel responsible for ion permeation. By contrast, sensing physical cues such as voltage, pressure, and temperature arises from more varied mechanisms. Voltage is commonly sensed by a local, domain-based strategy, whereas the predominant paradigm for pressure sensing employs a global response in channel structure to membrane tension changes. Temperature sensing has been the most challenging response to understand and whether discrete sensor domains exist for pressure and temperature has been the subject of much investigation and debate. Recent exciting advances have uncovered discrete sensor modules for pressure and temperature in force-sensitive and thermal-sensitive ion channels, respectively. In particular, characterization of bacterial voltage-gated sodium channel (BacNaV) thermal responses has identified a coiled-coil thermosensor that controls channel function through a temperature-dependent unfolding event. This coiled-coil thermosensor blueprint recurs in other temperature sensitive ion channels and thermosensitive proteins. Together with the identification of ion channel pressure sensing domains, these examples demonstrate that "local" domain-based solutions for sensing force and temperature exist and highlight the diversity of both global and local strategies that channels use to sense physical inputs. The modular nature of these newly discovered physical signal sensors provides opportunities to engineer novel pressure-sensitive and thermosensitive proteins and raises new questions about how such modular sensors may have evolved and empowered ion channel pores with new sensibilities.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 30%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Researcher 4 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 13 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 22%
Neuroscience 8 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 12 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,856,604
of 23,818,521 outputs
Outputs from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#476
of 1,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,298
of 445,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,818,521 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,973 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.