↓ Skip to main content

A brief history of tracheostomy and tracheal intubation, from the Bronze Age to the Space Age

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
Title
A brief history of tracheostomy and tracheal intubation, from the Bronze Age to the Space Age
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, November 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00134-007-0931-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Szmuk, Tiberiu Ezri, Shmuel Evron, Yehudah Roth, Jeffrey Katz

Abstract

To present a concise history of tracheostomy and tracheal intubation for the approximately forty centuries from their earliest description around 2000 BC until the middle of the twentieth century, at which time a proliferation of advances marked the beginning of the modern era of anesthesiology. Review of the literature. The colorful and checkered past of tracheostomy and tracheal intubation informs contemporary understanding of these procedures. Often, the decision whether to perform a life-saving tracheostomy or tracheal intubation has been as important as the technical ability to perform it. The dawn of modern airway management owes its existence to the historical development of increasingly effective airway devices and to regular contributions of research into the pathophysiology of the upper airway.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 1%
South Africa 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 226 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 25 11%
Student > Postgraduate 25 11%
Student > Master 23 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 8%
Other 57 24%
Unknown 66 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 131 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Arts and Humanities 3 1%
Social Sciences 3 1%
Other 8 3%
Unknown 70 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,584,025
of 25,382,250 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,174
of 5,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,296
of 84,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#5
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.