You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of the Glidescope®, the Pentax AWS®, and the Truview EVO2® with the Macintosh laryngoscope in experienced anaesthetists: a manikin study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1093/bja/aen342 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M.A. Malik, C. O’Donoghue, J. Carney, C.H. Maharaj, B.H. Harte, J.G. Laffey |
| Abstract |
The Pentax Airwayscope, the Glidescope, and the Truview EVO2 constitute three novel laryngoscopes that facilitate visualization of the vocal cords without alignment of the oral, pharyngeal, and tracheal axes. We compared these devices with the Macintosh laryngoscope in a simulated easy and difficult laryngoscopy. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 32% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 74% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2010.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#3,598
of 6,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,229
of 189,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#12
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.