↓ Skip to main content

A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation; a prospective study

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, July 1985
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2040 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
587 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation; a prospective study
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, July 1985
DOI 10.1007/bf03011357
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Rao Mallampati, Stephen P. Gatt, Laveme D. Gugino, Sukumar P. Desai, Barbara Waraksa, Dubravka Freiberger, Philip L. Liu

Abstract

It has been suggested that the size of the base of the tongue is an important factor determining the degree of difficulty of direct laryngoscopy. A relatively simple grading system which involves preoperative ability to visualize the faucial pillars, soft palate and base of uvula was designed as a means of predicting the degree of difficulty in laryngeal exposure. The system was evaluated in 210 patients. The degree of difficulty in visualizing these three structures was an accurate predictor of difficulty with direct laryngoscopy (p less than 0.001).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 587 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 574 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 63 11%
Student > Master 63 11%
Researcher 61 10%
Other 52 9%
Student > Bachelor 43 7%
Other 135 23%
Unknown 170 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 317 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 2%
Engineering 10 2%
Unspecified 7 1%
Other 31 5%
Unknown 187 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,862,837
of 25,711,194 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#230
of 2,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142
of 9,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,899 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them