Title |
Rational Treatment Choices for Non‐major Depressions in Primary Care
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2002
|
DOI | 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10350.x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ronald T Ackermann, John W Williams |
Abstract |
This review synthesizes available evidence for managing clinically significant dysphoric symptoms encountered in primary care, when formal criteria for major depression or dysthymia are not met. Discussion is focused on premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) and minor depression because of their significant prevalence in the primary care setting and the lack of clear practice guidelines for addressing each illness. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 84 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 18% |
Student > Master | 15 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 10% |
Professor | 7 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
Other | 18 | 20% |
Unknown | 17 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 31% |
Psychology | 14 | 16% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 13 | 15% |
Unknown | 20 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2021.
All research outputs
#5,240,498
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3,144
of 8,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,599
of 126,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.