↓ Skip to main content

Loose women or lost women? The re-emergence of the myth of white slavery in contemporary discourses of trafficking in women

Overview of attention for article published in Gender Issues, December 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
415 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
Title
Loose women or lost women? The re-emergence of the myth of white slavery in contemporary discourses of trafficking in women
Published in
Gender Issues, December 1999
DOI 10.1007/s12147-999-0021-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jo Doezema

Abstract

This article compares current concerns about "trafficking in women" with turn of the century discourses about "white slavery". It traces the emergence of narratives on "white slavery" and their reemergence in the moral panics and boundary crises of contemporary discourses on "trafficking in women". Drawing on historical analysis and contemporary representations of sex worker migration, the paper argues that the narratives of innocent, virginal victims purveyed in the "trafficking in women" discourse are a modern version of the myth of "white slavery". These narratives, the article argues, reflect persisting anxieties about female sexuality and women's autonomy. Racialized representations of the migrant "Other" as helpless, child-like, victims strips sex workers of their agency. This article argues that while the myth of "trafficking in women"/"white slavery" is ostensibly about protecting women, the underlying moral concern is with the control of "loose women". Through the denial of migrant sex workers' agency, these discourses serve to reinforce notions of female dependence and purity that serve to further marginalize sex workers and undermine their human rights.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 178 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 22%
Student > Master 31 16%
Student > Bachelor 29 15%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 28 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 107 57%
Arts and Humanities 22 12%
Psychology 9 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 26 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,168,007
of 25,711,194 outputs
Outputs from Gender Issues
#62
of 173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,205
of 108,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gender Issues
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,194 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them