↓ Skip to main content

U.S. and Canadian pharmacists' attitudes, knowledge, and professional practice behaviors toward dietary supplements: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
U.S. and Canadian pharmacists' attitudes, knowledge, and professional practice behaviors toward dietary supplements: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, September 2006
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-6-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Della Kwan, Kristine Hirschkorn, Heather Boon

Abstract

Although dietary supplements (DS) are widely sold in pharmacies, the legal, ethical, and practice responsibilities of pharmacists with respect to these products have not been well defined. This systematic review of pharmacists' attitudes, knowledge, and professional practice behaviours toward DS is intended to inform pharmacy regulators' and educators' decision making around this topic.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 116 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Student > Master 14 12%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 26 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 22 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 27 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2015.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,234
of 3,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,546
of 67,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,624 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.