↓ Skip to main content

A chlorine-free embedding medium for use in X-ray analytical electron microscope localisation of chloride in biological tissues

Overview of attention for article published in Histochemistry and Cell Biology, June 1974
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
A chlorine-free embedding medium for use in X-ray analytical electron microscope localisation of chloride in biological tissues
Published in
Histochemistry and Cell Biology, June 1974
DOI 10.1007/bf00499664
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reinhard F. M. Van Steveninck, Margaret E. Van Steveninck, Theodore A. Hall, Patricia D. Peters

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Other 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#306
of 1,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#906
of 3,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them