↓ Skip to main content

Microprobe study of toad urinary bladder in absence of serosal K+

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Membrane Biology, October 1980
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Microprobe study of toad urinary bladder in absence of serosal K+
Published in
The Journal of Membrane Biology, October 1980
DOI 10.1007/bf01869460
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mortimer M. Civan, Theodore A. Hall, Brij L. Gupta

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 50%
Other 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2021.
All research outputs
#7,850,857
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Membrane Biology
#169
of 803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,776
of 6,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Membrane Biology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 803 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.