↓ Skip to main content

Prediction of Resectability in Pseudomyxoma Peritonei with a New CT Score

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Prediction of Resectability in Pseudomyxoma Peritonei with a New CT Score
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, November 2017
DOI 10.1245/s10434-017-6275-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Morgane Bouquot, Anthony Dohan, Etienne Gayat, Maxime Barat, Olivier Glehen, Marc Pocard, Pascal Rousset, Clarisse Eveno

Abstract

Curative treatment of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The aim of this study was to build and evaluate a preoperative imaging score to predict resectability. Between 2007 and 2014, all PMP patients in two tertiary reference centers who underwent laparotomy with intent to undergo CRS and HIPEC were included in this study retrospectively. Thickness of tumor burden was measured on preoperative multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) by two radiologists blinded to surgical results in five predetermined areas. Patients were divided into two cohorts with the same resectability rate (building and validation). The performances of the scores were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. Overall, 126 patients were included, with compete CRS being achieved in 91/126 patients (72.2%). Two cohorts of 63 patients matched by age, sex, burden of disease, resectability rate, and pathological grade were constituted. The MDCT score was the sum of the five measures, and was higher in unresectable disease [median 46.2 mm (range 27.9-74.6) vs. 0.0 mm (range 0.0-14.0), p < 0.001]. Area under the ROC curve was 0.863 (range 0.727-0.968) and 0.801 (range 0.676-0.914) in the building and validation cohorts, respectively. A threshold of 28 mm yielded a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive value of 94, 81, 81 and 94% in the building cohort, and 80, 68, 59 and 85% in the validation cohort, respectively. Using our score, overall and disease-free survival were increased in the group classified as resectable. A simple preoperative MDCT score measuring tumor burden in the perihepatic region is able to predict resectability and survival of PMP patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Other 2 9%
Lecturer 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 9 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Unknown 10 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,590,242
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#666
of 6,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,127
of 437,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#10
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.