↓ Skip to main content

Biomarker-Driven Therapy in Metastatic Gastric and Esophageal Cancer: Real-Life Clinical Experience

Overview of attention for article published in Targeted Oncology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Biomarker-Driven Therapy in Metastatic Gastric and Esophageal Cancer: Real-Life Clinical Experience
Published in
Targeted Oncology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11523-017-0548-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ofer Purim, Alexander Beny, Moshe Inbar, Katerina Shulman, Baruch Brenner, Elizabeth Dudnik, Felix Bokstein, Mark Temper, Dror Limon, Diana Matceyevsky, David Sarid, Amiel Segal, Valeriya Semenisty, Ronen Brenner, Tamar Peretz, Efraim Idelevich, Sharon Pelles-Avraham, Amichay Meirovitz, Arie Figer, Kenneth Russell, Andreas Voss, Addie Dvir, Lior Soussan-Gutman, Ayala Hubert

Abstract

Precision treatment of cancer uses biomarker-driven therapy to individualize and optimize patient care. To evaluate real-life clinical experience with biomarker-driven therapy in metastatic gastric and esophageal cancer in Israel. This multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients with metastatic gastric or esophageal cancer who were treated in the participating institutions and underwent biomarker-driven therapy. Treatment was considered to have a benefit if the ratio between the longest progression-free survival (PFS) post biomarker-driven therapy and the last PFS before the biomarker-driven therapy was ≥1.3. The null hypothesis was that ≤15% of patients gain such benefit. The analysis included 46 patients (61% men; median age, 58 years; 57% with poorly-differentiated tumors). At least one actionable (i.e., predictive of response to a specific therapy) biomarker was identified for each patient. Immunohistochemistry was performed on all samples and identified 1-8 (median: 3) biomarkers per patient (most commonly: low TS, high TOPO1, high TOP2A). Twenty-eight patients received therapy after the biomarker analysis (1-4 lines). In the 1st line after biomarker analysis, five patients (18%) achieved a partial response and five (18%) stable disease; the median (range) PFS was 129 (12-1155) days. Twenty-four patients were evaluable for PFS ratio analysis; in seven (29.2%), the ratio was ≥1.3. In a one-sided exact binomial test vs. the null hypothesis, p = 0.019; therefore, the null hypothesis was rejected. Our findings demonstrated that implementing biomarker-driven analysis is feasible and could provide clinical benefit for a considerable proportion (~30%) of patients with metastatic gastric or esophageal cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 25%
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2018.
All research outputs
#15,489,831
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from Targeted Oncology
#270
of 555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,111
of 441,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Targeted Oncology
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 555 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.