↓ Skip to main content

HDG-NEFEM with Degree Adaptivity for Stokes Flows

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Scientific Computing, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
HDG-NEFEM with Degree Adaptivity for Stokes Flows
Published in
Journal of Scientific Computing, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10915-018-0657-2
Authors

Ruben Sevilla, Antonio Huerta

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Master 1 7%
Lecturer 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 7 47%
Mathematics 1 7%
Unknown 7 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2018.
All research outputs
#18,575,287
of 23,852,579 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Scientific Computing
#250
of 862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#313,641
of 441,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Scientific Computing
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,852,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 862 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.