↓ Skip to main content

Pierre Louis Moreau de Maupertuis—A precursor of Mendel?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the History of Biology, March 1983
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Pierre Louis Moreau de Maupertuis—A precursor of Mendel?
Published in
Journal of the History of Biology, March 1983
DOI 10.1007/bf00186677
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iris Sandler

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Engineering 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2023.
All research outputs
#8,880,246
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the History of Biology
#201
of 506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,218
of 8,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the History of Biology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.