| Title |
Comparing Parallel Functional Languages: Programming and Performance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Higher-Order & Symbolic Computation, September 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1025641323400 |
| Authors |
H.-W. Loidl, F. Rubio, N. Scaife, K. Hammond, S. Horiguchi, U. Klusik, R. Loogen, G.J. Michaelson, R. Peña, S. Priebe, Á.J. Rebón, P.W. Trinder |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 4% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 22% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Professor | 6 | 12% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 37 | 73% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2015.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Higher-Order & Symbolic Computation
#51
of 58 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,184
of 53,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Higher-Order & Symbolic Computation
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.