↓ Skip to main content

Statistical learning is related to early literacy-related skills

Overview of attention for article published in Reading and Writing, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
Title
Statistical learning is related to early literacy-related skills
Published in
Reading and Writing, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11145-014-9533-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mercedes Spencer, Michael P. Kaschak, John L. Jones, Christopher J. Lonigan

Abstract

It has been demonstrated that statistical learning, or the ability to use statistical information to learn the structure of one's environment, plays a role in young children's acquisition of linguistic knowledge. Although most research on statistical learning has focused on language acquisition processes, such as the segmentation of words from fluent speech and the learning of syntactic structure, some recent studies have explored the extent to which individual differences in statistical learning are related to literacy-relevant knowledge and skills. The present study extends on this literature by investigating the relations between two measures of statistical learning and multiple measures of skills that are critical to the development of literacy-oral language, vocabulary knowledge, and phonological processing-within a single model. Our sample included a total of 553 typically developing children from prekindergarten through second grade. Structural equation modeling revealed that statistical learning accounted for a unique portion of the variance in these literacy-related skills. Practical implications for instruction and assessment are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 168 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 21%
Student > Master 28 16%
Researcher 19 11%
Lecturer 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 33 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 54 32%
Linguistics 23 14%
Social Sciences 15 9%
Neuroscience 8 5%
Mathematics 6 4%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 47 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2018.
All research outputs
#4,764,806
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Reading and Writing
#136
of 797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,330
of 367,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reading and Writing
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.