↓ Skip to main content

Treating pigs: Balancing standardisation and individual treatments in translational neonatology research

Overview of attention for article published in BioSocieties, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Treating pigs: Balancing standardisation and individual treatments in translational neonatology research
Published in
BioSocieties, October 2017
DOI 10.1057/s41292-017-0071-2
Authors

Mie S. Dam, Mette N. Svendsen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 45%
Student > Master 2 18%
Other 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 5 45%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,233,170
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from BioSocieties
#172
of 394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,265
of 327,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioSocieties
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.