↓ Skip to main content

The importance of pre‐thicket conifer plantations for nesting Hen Harriers Circus cyaneus in Ireland

Overview of attention for article published in Ibis, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The importance of pre‐thicket conifer plantations for nesting Hen Harriers Circus cyaneus in Ireland
Published in
Ibis, March 2009
DOI 10.1111/j.1474-919x.2009.00918.x
Authors

MARK W. WILSON, SANDRA IRWIN, DAVID W. NORRISS, STEPHEN F. NEWTON, KEVIN COLLINS, THOMAS C. KELLY, JOHN O’HALLORAN

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 3%
Chile 1 2%
France 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Romania 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 57 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 27%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Other 6 9%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 12 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 47%
Environmental Science 21 33%
Engineering 1 2%
Unknown 12 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2019.
All research outputs
#6,125,358
of 24,602,766 outputs
Outputs from Ibis
#1,109
of 2,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,336
of 97,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ibis
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,602,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.