You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Transcriptional stimulation of rate-limiting components of the autophagic pathway improves plant fitness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Experimental Botany, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jxb/ery010 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elena A Minina, Panagiotis N Moschou, Ramesh R Vetukuri, Victoria Sanchez-Vera, Catarina Cardoso, Qinsong Liu, Pernilla H Elander, Kerstin Dalman, Mirela Beganovic, Jenny Lindberg Yilmaz, Sofia Marmon, Lana Shabala, Maria F Suarez, Karin Ljung, Ondřej Novák, Sergey Shabala, Sten Stymne, Daniel Hofius, Peter V Bozhkov |
| Abstract |
Autophagy is a major catabolic process whereby autophagosomes deliver cytoplasmic content to the lytic compartment for recycling. Autophagosome formation requires two ubiquitin-like systems conjugating Atg12 with Atg5 and Atg8 with lipid phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), respectively. Genetic suppression of these systems causes autophagy-deficient phenotypes with reduced fitness and longevity. We show that Atg5 and E1-like enzyme, Atg7, are rate-limiting components of the Atg8-PE conjugation in Arabidopsis. Overexpression of ATG5 or ATG7 stimulates Atg8 lipidation, autophagosome formation and autophagic flux. It also induces transcriptional changes opposite to those observed in atg5 and atg7 mutants, favoring stress resistance and growth. As a result, ATG5- or ATG7-overexpressing plants exhibit increased resistance to necrotrophic pathogens and oxidative stress, delayed aging and enhanced growth, seed set and seed oil content. This work provides experimental paradigm and mechanistic insight into genetic stimulation of autophagy in planta and shows its efficiency for improving plant productivity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 152 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 21% |
| Researcher | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 15% |
| Unknown | 41 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 23% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 1% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 49 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2018.
All research outputs
#15,489,831
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Botany
#5,170
of 6,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,111
of 441,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Botany
#111
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.