↓ Skip to main content

Neanderthal selective hunting of reindeer? The case study of Abri du Maras (south-eastern France)

Overview of attention for article published in Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Neanderthal selective hunting of reindeer? The case study of Abri du Maras (south-eastern France)
Published in
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12520-017-0580-8
Authors

C. Daujeard, D. Vettese, K. Britton, P. Béarez, N. Boulbes, E. Crégut-Bonnoure, E. Desclaux, N. Lateur, A. Pike-Tay, F. Rivals, E. Allué, M. G. Chacón, S. Puaud, M. Richard, M.-A. Courty, R. Gallotti, B. Hardy, J. J. Bahain, C. Falguères, E. Pons-Branchu, H. Valladas, M.-H. Moncel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 4 5%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 27 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 24 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 8%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 38 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,751,356
of 25,364,603 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#396
of 948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,153
of 447,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,364,603 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.