↓ Skip to main content

In vivo dermoscopic and confocal microscopy multistep algorithm to detect in situ melanomas

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Dermatology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In vivo dermoscopic and confocal microscopy multistep algorithm to detect in situ melanomas
Published in
British Journal of Dermatology, April 2018
DOI 10.1111/bjd.16364
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Borsari, R. Pampena, E. Benati, C. Bombonato, A. Kyrgidis, E. Moscarella, A. Lallas, G. Argenziano, G. Pellacani, C. Longo

Abstract

Although several dermoscopic features of in situ melanoma (MIS) have been identified, data on confocal features for MIS are still lacking. To identify RCM (reflectance confocal microscopy) features of MIS and to develop a diagnostic score for MIS while combining dermoscopy and RCM. 120 MIS and 213 nevi (test set) were retrospectively analysed to assess the presence of dermoscopic and RCM criteria. Facial and acral lesions have been excluded. Spearman's correlation, univariate and multivariate regression models were performed to find features significantly correlated with MIS diagnosis. Multivariate results on the test set allowed the development of a multi-step algorithm, that was tested on a validation set counting 100 lesions. Dermoscopic atypical network and regression resulted as independent predicting factors for MIS diagnosis (OR=3.437, 95%CI=1.696-6.966 and OR=4.168, 95%CI=1.930-9.002 respectively). Significant confocal predictors for malignancy were epidermal pagetoid spread (OR=2.829, 95%CI=1.324-6.043) and junctional cytological atypia (OR=3.390, 95%CI=1.383-8.305 if focal, OR=8.439, 95%CI=3.213-22.165 if widespread). A multi-step diagnostic algorithm able to predict MIS with a sensitivity of 92.5% and a specificity of 61% was developed. The validation set confirmed the high diagnostic value (sensitivity 92%, specificity 58%). An easy and reproducible multi-step algorithm for MIS detection is suggested, that can be routinely used in tertiary centres. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 18%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 10 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 55%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2020.
All research outputs
#14,605,790
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Dermatology
#5,818
of 9,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,047
of 339,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Dermatology
#111
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.