Title |
Reconstructing the demographic history of the Himalayan and adjoining populations
|
---|---|
Published in |
Human Genetics, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00439-018-1867-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rakesh Tamang, Gyaneshwer Chaubey, Amrita Nandan, Periyasamy Govindaraj, Vipin Kumar Singh, Niraj Rai, Chandana Basu Mallick, Vishwas Sharma, Varun Kumar Sharma, Anish M. Shah, Albert Lalremruata, Alla G. Reddy, Deepa Selvi Rani, Pilot Doviah, Neetu Negi, Yarin Hadid, Veena Pande, Satti Vishnupriya, George van Driem, Doron M. Behar, Tikaram Sharma, Lalji Singh, Richard Villems, Kumarasamy Thangaraj |
Abstract |
The rugged topography of the Himalayan region has hindered large-scale human migrations, population admixture and assimilation. Such complexity in geographical structure might have facilitated the existence of several small isolated communities in this region. We have genotyped about 850,000 autosomal markers among 35 individuals belonging to the four major populations inhabiting the Himalaya and adjoining regions. In addition, we have genotyped 794 individuals belonging to 16 ethnic groups from the same region, for uniparental (mitochondrial and Y chromosomal DNA) markers. Our results in the light of various statistical analyses suggest a closer link of the Himalayan and adjoining populations to East Asia than their immediate geographical neighbours in South Asia. Allele frequency-based analyses likely support the existence of a specific ancestry component in the Himalayan and adjoining populations. The admixture time estimate suggests a recent westward migration of populations living to the East of the Himalaya. Furthermore, the uniparental marker analysis among the Himalayan and adjoining populations reveal the presence of East, Southeast and South Asian genetic signatures. Interestingly, we observed an antagonistic association of Y chromosomal haplogroups O3 and D clines with the longitudinal distance. Thus, we summarise that studying the Himalayan and adjoining populations is essential for a comprehensive reconstruction of the human evolutionary and ethnolinguistic history of eastern Eurasia. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 5 | 42% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
Canada | 1 | 8% |
Estonia | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
Scientists | 4 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 22% |
Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
Researcher | 3 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 13% |
Unknown | 16 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 16 | 36% |