↓ Skip to main content

Photonic monitoring of treatment during infection and sepsis: development of new detection strategies and potential clinical applications

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Photonic monitoring of treatment during infection and sepsis: development of new detection strategies and potential clinical applications
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00216-017-0713-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Astrid Tannert, Anuradha Ramoji, Ute Neugebauer, Jürgen Popp

Abstract

Despite the strong decline in the infection-associated mortality since the development of the first antibiotics, infectious diseases are still a major cause of death in the world. With the rising number of antibiotic-resistant pathogens, the incidence of deaths caused by infections may increase strongly in the future. Survival rates in sepsis, which occurs when body response to infections becomes uncontrolled, are still very poor if an adequate therapy is not initiated immediately. Therefore, approaches to monitor the treatment efficacy are crucially needed to adapt therapeutic strategies according to the patient's response. An increasing number of photonic technologies are being considered for diagnostic purpose and monitoring of therapeutic response; however many of these strategies have not been introduced into clinical routine, yet. Here, we review photonic strategies to monitor response to treatment in patients with infectious disease, sepsis, and septic shock. We also include some selected approaches for the development of new drugs in animal models as well as new monitoring strategies which might be applicable to evaluate treatment response in humans in the future. Figure Label-free probing of blood properties using photonics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Master 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 14 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 6 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 15 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2018.
All research outputs
#15,518,560
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#4,696
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,886
of 446,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#46
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.