↓ Skip to main content

How to amend land subsidence treatment policies to solve coastal subsidence problems in Taiwan

Overview of attention for article published in Regional Environmental Change, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
How to amend land subsidence treatment policies to solve coastal subsidence problems in Taiwan
Published in
Regional Environmental Change, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10113-010-0199-0
Authors

Peter Lin Sun, Chun-Chou Yang, Tai-Wai Lin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 6%
United Kingdom 1 6%
Unknown 14 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 44%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 4 25%
Environmental Science 3 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 13%
Computer Science 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Regional Environmental Change
#899
of 1,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,578
of 181,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Environmental Change
#13
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.