↓ Skip to main content

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

Overview of attention for article published in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
Title
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
Published in
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00787-012-0360-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Søren Dalsgaard

Abstract

The proposed revision of the diagnostic criteria in DSM-5 for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) will not fundamentally change the concept of ADHD. This is mainly due to the fact that, DSM-5 will retain the exact DSM-IV wording of all 18 symptoms, but will add new examples that make the criteria more appropriate for children, adolescents and adults. The age of onset will also be changed from 7 to 12 years, the subtyping of the disorder will change, and pervasive developmental disorders will no longer be an exclusion criterion. Although the main concept is unchanged, the suggested changes will most likely increase the prevalence of ADHD, especially in adults and adolescents, but maybe also in children. The added examples will also result in necessary revisions and new validations of rating scales and diagnostic interviews. This review will examine each of the proposed DSM-5 changes and the impact they may have, and in addition, the paper will make an overview of the main characteristics of some of the international and national guidelines for assessment and treatment of ADHD and how these impact the clinical practice.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 151 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 19%
Student > Bachelor 24 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 7%
Other 29 18%
Unknown 28 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 45 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 18%
Social Sciences 19 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 37 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2021.
All research outputs
#4,916,068
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#534
of 1,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,311
of 281,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.