| Title |
Flaming? What flaming? The pitfalls and potentials of researching online hostility
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ethics and Information Technology, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10676-015-9362-0 |
| Authors |
Emma A. Jane |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 201 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 47 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 19% |
| Researcher | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 16% |
| Unknown | 37 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 61 | 30% |
| Psychology | 29 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 27 | 13% |
| Arts and Humanities | 17 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 40 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,283,348
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from Ethics and Information Technology
#95
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,208
of 358,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ethics and Information Technology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them