↓ Skip to main content

A novel comparative effectiveness study of Tai Chi versus aerobic exercise for fibromyalgia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
370 Mendeley
Title
A novel comparative effectiveness study of Tai Chi versus aerobic exercise for fibromyalgia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-0548-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chenchen Wang, Timothy McAlindon, Roger A Fielding, William F Harvey, Jeffrey B Driban, Lori Lyn Price, Robert Kalish, Anna Schmid, Tammy M Scott, Christopher H Schmid

Abstract

BackgroundFibromyalgia is a chronic musculoskeletal pain syndrome that causes substantial physical and psychological impairment and costs the US healthcare system over $25 billion annually. Current pharmacological therapies may cause serious adverse effects, are expensive, and fail to effectively improve pain and function. Finding new and effective non-pharmacological treatments for fibromyalgia patients is urgently needed. We are currently conducting the first comparative effectiveness randomized trial of Tai Chi versus aerobic exercise (a recommended component of the current standard of care) in a large fibromyalgia population. This article describes the design and conduct of this trial.Methods/designA single-center, 52-week, randomized controlled trial of Tai Chi versus aerobic exercise is being conducted at an urban tertiary medical center in Boston, Massachusetts. We plan to recruit 216 patients with fibromyalgia. The study population consists of adults ¿21 years of age with fibromyalgia who meet American College of Rheumatology 1990 and 2010 diagnostic criteria. Participants are randomized to one of four Tai Chi intervention groups: 12 or 24 weeks of supervised Tai Chi held once or twice per week, or a supervised aerobic exercise control held twice per week for 24 weeks. The primary outcome is the change in Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire total score from baseline to 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes include measures of widespread pain, symptom severity, functional performance, balance, muscle strength and power, psychological functioning, sleep quality, self-efficacy, durability effects, and health-related quality of life at 12, 24, and 52 week follow-up.DiscussionThis study is the first comparative effectiveness randomized trial of Tai Chi versus aerobic exercise in a large fibromyalgia population with long-term follow up. We present here a robust and well-designed trial to determine the optimal frequency and duration of a supervised Tai Chi intervention with regard to short- and long-term effectiveness. The trial also explores multiple outcomes to elucidate the potential mechanisms of Tai Chi and aerobic exercise and the generalizability of these interventions across instructors. Results of this study are expected to have important public health implications for patients with a major disabling disease that incurs substantial health burdens and economic costs.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01420640, registered 18 August 2011.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 370 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 366 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 62 17%
Student > Master 44 12%
Researcher 32 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 7%
Other 59 16%
Unknown 119 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 68 18%
Sports and Recreations 28 8%
Psychology 19 5%
Social Sciences 16 4%
Other 31 8%
Unknown 127 34%