↓ Skip to main content

Interventions at the Transition from Prison to the Community for Prisoners with Mental Illness: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 709)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
35 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
Title
Interventions at the Transition from Prison to the Community for Prisoners with Mental Illness: A Systematic Review
Published in
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10488-018-0848-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Hopkin, S. Evans-Lacko, A. Forrester, J. Shaw, G. Thornicroft

Abstract

Prisoners have high rates of mental illness and the transition from prison to the community is a problematic time for the provision of mental health services and a range of negative outcomes have been identified in this period. A systematic review was conducted to identify interventions for prisoners with diagnosed mental health conditions that targeted this transition period. Fourteen papers from 13 research studies were included. The interventions identified in this review were targeted at different stages of release from prison and their content differed, ranging from Medicaid enrolment schemes to assertive community treatment. It was found that insurance coverage, and contact with mental health and other services can be improved by interventions in this period but the impact on reoffending and reincarceration is complex and interventions may lead to increased return to prison. There is a developing evidence base that suggests targeting this period can improve contact with community mental health and other health services but further high quality evidence with comparable outcomes is needed to provide more definitive conclusions. The impact of programmes on return to prison should be evaluated further to establish the effect of interventions on clinical outcomes and to clarify the role of interventions on reincarceration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 177 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 12%
Researcher 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Student > Master 19 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 33 19%
Unknown 49 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 19%
Social Sciences 24 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 12%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 55 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2022.
All research outputs
#845,558
of 25,292,646 outputs
Outputs from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#22
of 709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,925
of 454,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.