↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating Community Engagement and Benefit-Sharing Practices in Australian Wind Farm Development

Overview of attention for article published in Case Studies in the Environment, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating Community Engagement and Benefit-Sharing Practices in Australian Wind Farm Development
Published in
Case Studies in the Environment, December 2017
DOI 10.1525/cse.2017.000521
Authors

Nina Lansbury Hall, Jarra Hicks, Taryn Lane, Emily Wood

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 23%
Social Sciences 3 23%
Unknown 7 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,194,561
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Case Studies in the Environment
#62
of 240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,267
of 451,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Case Studies in the Environment
#18
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 240 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.