↓ Skip to main content

Understanding Romanowsky staining

Overview of attention for article published in Histochemistry and Cell Biology, May 1987
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
4 patents
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Understanding Romanowsky staining
Published in
Histochemistry and Cell Biology, May 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf00490267
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. W. Horobin, K. J. Walter

Abstract

Normal blood smears were stained by the standardised azure B-eosin Y Romanowsky procedure recently introduced by the ICSH, and the classical picture resulted. The effects of varying the times and temperature of staining, the composition of the solvent (buffer concentration, methanol content, & pH), the concentration of the dyes, and the mode of fixation were studied. The results are best understood in terms of the following staining mechanism. Initial colouration involves simple acid and basic dyeing. Eosin yields red erythrocytes and eosinophil granules. Azure B very rapidly gives rise to blue stained chromatin, neutrophil specific granules, platelets and ribosome-rich cytoplasms; also to violet basophil granules. Subsequently the azure B in certain structures combines with eosin to give purple azure B-eosin complexes, leaving other structures with their initial colours. The selectivity of complex formation is controlled by rate of entry of eosin into azure B stained structures. Only faster staining structures (i.e. chromatin, neutrophil specific granules, and platelets) permit formation of the purple complex in the standard method. This staining mechanism illuminates scientific problems (e.g. the nature of 'toxic' granules) and assists technical trouble-shooting (e.g. why nuclei sometimes stain blue, not purple).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 53 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Master 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Professor 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 18%
Chemistry 3 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 17 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,835,157
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#103
of 1,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,346
of 11,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them