You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell Death & Differentiation, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41418-017-0012-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lorenzo Galluzzi, Ilio Vitale, Stuart A. Aaronson, John M. Abrams, Dieter Adam, Patrizia Agostinis, Emad S. Alnemri, Lucia Altucci, Ivano Amelio, David W. Andrews, Margherita Annicchiarico-Petruzzelli, Alexey V. Antonov, Eli Arama, Eric H. Baehrecke, Nickolai A. Barlev, Nicolas G. Bazan, Francesca Bernassola, Mathieu J. M. Bertrand, Katiuscia Bianchi, Mikhail V. Blagosklonny, Klas Blomgren, Christoph Borner, Patricia Boya, Catherine Brenner, Michelangelo Campanella, Eleonora Candi, Didac Carmona-Gutierrez, Francesco Cecconi, Francis K.-M. Chan, Navdeep S. Chandel, Emily H. Cheng, Jerry E. Chipuk, John A. Cidlowski, Aaron Ciechanover, Gerald M. Cohen, Marcus Conrad, Juan R. Cubillos-Ruiz, Peter E. Czabotar, Vincenzo D’Angiolella, Ted M. Dawson, Valina L. Dawson, Vincenzo De Laurenzi, Ruggero De Maria, Klaus-Michael Debatin, Ralph J. DeBerardinis, Mohanish Deshmukh, Nicola Di Daniele, Francesco Di Virgilio, Vishva M. Dixit, Scott J. Dixon, Colin S. Duckett, Brian D. Dynlacht, Wafik S. El-Deiry, John W. Elrod, Gian Maria Fimia, Simone Fulda, Ana J. García-Sáez, Abhishek D. Garg, Carmen Garrido, Evripidis Gavathiotis, Pierre Golstein, Eyal Gottlieb, Douglas R. Green, Lloyd A. Greene, Hinrich Gronemeyer, Atan Gross, Gyorgy Hajnoczky, J. Marie Hardwick, Isaac S. Harris, Michael O. Hengartner, Claudio Hetz, Hidenori Ichijo, Marja Jäättelä, Bertrand Joseph, Philipp J. Jost, Philippe P. Juin, William J. Kaiser, Michael Karin, Thomas Kaufmann, Oliver Kepp, Adi Kimchi, Richard N. Kitsis, Daniel J. Klionsky, Richard A. Knight, Sharad Kumar, Sam W. Lee, John J. Lemasters, Beth Levine, Andreas Linkermann, Stuart A. Lipton, Richard A. Lockshin, Carlos López-Otín, Scott W. Lowe, Tom Luedde, Enrico Lugli, Marion MacFarlane, Frank Madeo, Michal Malewicz, Walter Malorni, Gwenola Manic, Jean-Christophe Marine, Seamus J. Martin, Jean-Claude Martinou, Jan Paul Medema, Patrick Mehlen, Pascal Meier, Sonia Melino, Edward A. Miao, Jeffery D. Molkentin, Ute M. Moll, Cristina Muñoz-Pinedo, Shigekazu Nagata, Gabriel Nuñez, Andrew Oberst, Moshe Oren, Michael Overholtzer, Michele Pagano, Theocharis Panaretakis, Manolis Pasparakis, Josef M. Penninger, David M. Pereira, Shazib Pervaiz, Marcus E. Peter, Mauro Piacentini, Paolo Pinton, Jochen H.M. Prehn, Hamsa Puthalakath, Gabriel A. Rabinovich, Markus Rehm, Rosario Rizzuto, Cecilia M.P. Rodrigues, David C. Rubinsztein, Thomas Rudel, Kevin M. Ryan, Emre Sayan, Luca Scorrano, Feng Shao, Yufang Shi, John Silke, Hans-Uwe Simon, Antonella Sistigu, Brent R. Stockwell, Andreas Strasser, Gyorgy Szabadkai, Stephen W.G. Tait, Daolin Tang, Nektarios Tavernarakis, Andrew Thorburn, Yoshihide Tsujimoto, Boris Turk, Tom Vanden Berghe, Peter Vandenabeele, Matthew G. Vander Heiden, Andreas Villunger, Herbert W. Virgin, Karen H. Vousden, Domagoj Vucic, Erwin F. Wagner, Henning Walczak, David Wallach, Ying Wang, James A. Wells, Will Wood, Junying Yuan, Zahra Zakeri, Boris Zhivotovsky, Laurence Zitvogel, Gerry Melino, Guido Kroemer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 167 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 18 | 11% |
| Argentina | 11 | 7% |
| Germany | 9 | 5% |
| Spain | 9 | 5% |
| Italy | 5 | 3% |
| France | 5 | 3% |
| India | 4 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 16% |
| Unknown | 53 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 102 | 61% |
| Scientists | 52 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4,797 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4797 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 791 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 582 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 536 | 11% |
| Researcher | 509 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 275 | 6% |
| Other | 622 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1482 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1247 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 453 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 435 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 277 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 172 | 4% |
| Other | 588 | 12% |
| Unknown | 1625 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 196. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#205,362
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cell Death & Differentiation
#13
of 3,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,700
of 455,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Death & Differentiation
#1
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.