↓ Skip to main content

Failure Analysis of a Damaged Direct Injection Diesel Engine Piston

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Failure Analysis of a Damaged Direct Injection Diesel Engine Piston
Published in
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11668-017-0327-y
Authors

M. Caldera, J. M. Massone, R. A. Martínez

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 4 27%
Student > Master 3 20%
Unspecified 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 7 47%
Materials Science 2 13%
Unspecified 1 7%
Chemistry 1 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2018.
All research outputs
#21,415,544
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention
#98
of 100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,987
of 320,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.