↓ Skip to main content

ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008 The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2008 of the European Society…

Overview of attention for article published in European Heart Journal, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
patent
48 patents
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2542 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1033 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008 The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2008 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association of the ESC (HFA) and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM)
Published in
European Heart Journal, September 2008
DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn309
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. Dickstein, A. Cohen-Solal, G. Filippatos, J. J.V. McMurray, P. Ponikowski, P. A. Poole-Wilson, A. Stromberg, D. J. van Veldhuisen, D. Atar, A. W. Hoes, A. Keren, A. Mebazaa, M. Nieminen, S. G. Priori, K. Swedberg, A. Vahanian, J. Camm, R. De Caterina, V. Dean, K. Dickstein, G. Filippatos, C. Funck-Brentano, I. Hellemans, S. D. Kristensen, K. McGregor, U. Sechtem, S. Silber, M. Tendera, P. Widimsky, J. L. Zamorano, M. Tendera, A. Auricchio, J. Bax, M. Bohm, U. Corra, P. della Bella, P. M. Elliott, F. Follath, M. Gheorghiade, Y. Hasin, A. Hernborg, T. Jaarsma, M. Komajda, R. Kornowski, M. Piepoli, B. Prendergast, L. Tavazzi, J.-L. Vachiery, F. W. A. Verheugt, J. L. Zamorano, F. Zannad

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,033 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Brazil 5 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 1008 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 122 12%
Student > Master 116 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 114 11%
Student > Bachelor 109 11%
Student > Postgraduate 98 9%
Other 283 27%
Unknown 191 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 513 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 67 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 4%
Engineering 36 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 3%
Other 118 11%
Unknown 228 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,101,284
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from European Heart Journal
#1,735
of 11,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,429
of 101,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Heart Journal
#1
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.