↓ Skip to main content

Epidemiology and risk profile of heart failure

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Cardiology, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
patent
10 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
1620 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1566 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epidemiology and risk profile of heart failure
Published in
Nature Reviews Cardiology, November 2010
DOI 10.1038/nrcardio.2010.165
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anh L. Bui, Tamara B. Horwich, Gregg C. Fonarow

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) is a major public health issue, with a prevalence of over 5.8 million in the USA, and over 23 million worldwide, and rising. The lifetime risk of developing HF is one in five. Although promising evidence shows that the age-adjusted incidence of HF may have plateaued, HF still carries substantial morbidity and mortality, with 5-year mortality that rival those of many cancers. HF represents a considerable burden to the health-care system, responsible for costs of more than $39 billion annually in the USA alone, and high rates of hospitalizations, readmissions, and outpatient visits. HF is not a single entity, but a clinical syndrome that may have different characteristics depending on age, sex, race or ethnicity, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) status, and HF etiology. Furthermore, pathophysiological differences are observed among patients diagnosed with HF and reduced LVEF compared with HF and preserved LVEF, which are beginning to be better appreciated in epidemiological studies. A number of risk factors, such as ischemic heart disease, hypertension, smoking, obesity, and diabetes, among others, have been identified that both predict the incidence of HF as well as its severity. In this Review, we discuss key features of the epidemiology and risk profile of HF.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,566 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 7 <1%
Unknown 1540 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 232 15%
Student > Master 217 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 200 13%
Researcher 170 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 109 7%
Other 276 18%
Unknown 362 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 525 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 125 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 103 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 91 6%
Engineering 90 6%
Other 207 13%
Unknown 425 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2023.
All research outputs
#755,093
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Cardiology
#133
of 1,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,233
of 114,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Cardiology
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.